For asset managers, risk committees, custodians, and tokenization teams evaluating whether a tokenized product preserves the rights, structure, and stress behavior of the traditional asset.
Evaluates whether a tokenized product is institution-ready by translating structural and technical questions into clear investment gates: rights parity, operational resilience, auditability, settlement behavior, and named thresholds for what should change the view. Diligence across ~250 investments and ~$500M in assets under management, with decision-ready research and monitoring workflows built for investment committees.
Rights parity, custody structure, settlement behavior, auditability, and whether the product can survive a stress event without revealing hidden mismatches.
Liquidity pathways, reserve and custody dependencies, control-layer metrics, reporting quality, and which thresholds should trigger closer review or a changed position size.
Routing defaults, gateways, off-chain dependencies, and product structures that appear efficient until institutions rely on them under real conditions.
These papers are the closest match for how the diligence lens frames the work.
Nine-category checklist reverse-engineered from the six failure modes the USDC/SVB weekend exposed, structured around what risk committees actually ask.
Read
A view of how routing design shapes concentration, resilience, and where hidden dependencies sit.
Read
Settlement, custody, and the control layer behind digital-dollar and cash products, plus what institutions should track before a new money object becomes an operating assumption.
ReadAsset management, tokenization diligence, or investment research. Tell me what you're evaluating and I'll send the most relevant paper, resume version, or supporting material.